|
|
Post by erroneousmx5 on Jul 21, 2020 22:39:26 GMT
So, I've been considering the old favourite, carbon can delete, but...
(this is probably the part where i say something stupid)
... I'm quite fond of keeping the fuel vapours from the tank being vented into the intake manifold, so could I, in theory, JUST remove the canistor, and run the hoses straight through the inlet?
š¤
|
|
|
|
Post by wannabe on Jul 21, 2020 23:59:29 GMT
So on a hot day, all the expanding fuel vapour gets pushed into the intake, then when you start it extra fuel is added because the ECU can't see the vapours, meaning a very large bang, if I understand things correctly?? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Zed. on Jul 22, 2020 10:39:35 GMT
iirc, the carbon allows the fuel vapour to condense and the 'air' can then be vented to atmpsphere  its more of a city / urban emissions thing than power and usually the carbon is 'dead' after a few years so pointless to have it is in the tank's vent system, this is also usually not operating @ 100% efficentcy after 15-30 years either  most people just remove the carbon-can & complete the pipwork circuit as Mazda designed, I'm of the opinion that a 'roll-over' valve and some more thought is needed with a non oem system  Rich. |
|
|
|
Post by erroneousmx5 on Jul 22, 2020 16:30:12 GMT
Right, okay, probably best not then.
I'll just follow suit and remove it and link the pipe straight back to tank.
Thanks fellas šš»
|
|
le sigh