tsp
Chats A Lot
Posts: 439
|
Post by tsp on Jul 26, 2016 12:51:54 GMT
Can you break the mould when fettling an MX5?? Coming from the VW world, there was, for instance 5 or 5 'accepted' suspension set ups you could fit. Now the standard answer to any MX5 suspension question is... Meisters. I've only really tripped over this now I'm into the more expensive realms of modifying. I've done loads of small, cheap mods to my NA since I've owned it. No build thread needed, it'd be of no interest yet! Now I need to turn my attention to suspension, the bushes are soft and the springs/shocks need replacing really, not to mention the chassis braces to try and stop the jelly-wobble. I'm not sure I'd get change out of £1000 from doing that lot? I'm not moaning, just posing the question really. Where else can you get a reliable classic car to start with for £1500. I certainly love my MX5, even though it's got half the power of my last 'toy' car. It's just the modifying side of it seems a little bit elitist? Or is it just me?
|
|
|
Post by Horney on Jul 26, 2016 12:59:13 GMT
There's plenty of other options but the Meisters are tried and tested. I run GAZs on both my Mx5s though as I prefer them. BC coilovers are also popular or you can go budget crazy and buy some Ohlins.
The Mx5 has had a lot of development through club racing which has ended up with a pretty well defined short list of the best bits to fit for handling. The same is true of the classic mini scene with even more years of development. The VW scene I love, had many dubs, but a lot of it used to be being different for the sake of it. These days sadly it's all about brand new cars on air ride with financed wheels. Not really my cup of tea.
|
|
|
Post by wannabe on Jul 26, 2016 13:14:26 GMT
Is it not correct to say that the standard suspension could be called 'coilovers', in that they are springs wrapped round dampers to create on unit? (rather than being separate spring and damper, or torsion beam setup, etc) I do get what is being said, though, recommendations often seem to be to go straight for the commonly-recommended stuff, even if the recommender has not tried or fitted it themselves. (I know I am guilty for putting forward only OEM/ILM/SuperPro for bushes, being based entirely on what I have read rather than what I have tried, which will hopefully change at some point.) This sort of thinking leads to some crap kit getting a reputation as the 'thing to buy' (reference Toyos, for example ) but the man Horney does have a point about development and trial-and-error filtering out the crap over time. I guess I'm saying don't jump on any new and exciting bandwagons until they are proven lol re: overhauling suspension, RobinM on nutz is very happy with his chopped-one-coil Mk2 setup (including bumpstops) on a Mk1, and as you can seemingly pick up a decent secondhand set of Mk2 suspension for ~£200, I think that will be the way I am going. SuperPro polybushes for the whole car are then a smidge over £400 from Moss Europe, so effectively you could buy springs, dampers, top mounts and all the bushes for the same price as a new set of Meisters alone. I'd like to do all the wishbones too, but they seem to price up >£500 If you are not fitting them yourself and are getting all the bushes done then that will of course add cost, so assuming a day's work (max?) and then £100 for alignment when all fitted, a grand is probably the right sort of ballpark for a Mk2+SuperPro overhaul. All IMHO, of course lol
|
|
|
Post by AndyMk2 on Jul 26, 2016 13:57:20 GMT
Not really sure what the question is. Are you looking for cheaper options?
I suppose one of the problems with wanting to modify/restore an old car is the initial outlay is small but the parts prices don't follow suit. This makes it hard to justify spending 1000s on a car that only costs a few hundred pounds.
|
|
|
Post by BikeTuna on Jul 26, 2016 14:47:00 GMT
If everyone just did the same mods then we would all be driving the same cars - modding is as much a personal expression as it is a performance gain.
Yes, theres a difference between a set of Meisters and a set of Ohlins, but it'll be the top 5% who could not only tell the difference but really make use of the difference - a set of £200 coilovers will still drop the height and feel stiffer and if that's all you want then you will get it for your budget.
|
|
tsp
Chats A Lot
Posts: 439
|
Post by tsp on Jul 26, 2016 15:34:02 GMT
Apologies to everyone, as usual my ramblings have left a wake of confusion! I guess there never was a question, just a conversation starter really. You have all made some great points though. I was just curious if there was a different direction. There are some bargains out there, the Cobalt exhausts seem to be very reasonable. As you've said, you get what you pay for and you can pay good money for a race proven and tested product. I don't really have a yard stick to judge anything by, other than the slightly skewed VW scene as was rightly pointed out. I do have a good friend with a serious supercharged VX220 but that's in another league. I bet it's cheaper to charge an MX5 than one of those though! Great point on the value thing, that's probably only because time hasn't kept up with the MX5 yet. I will say though, there can't be many more cars out there though that have as many experts as us to hand!
|
|
|
Post by ghostrider on Jul 26, 2016 16:43:03 GMT
I guess it all comes down to bang for the buck but just how much 'bang' do you need? As an example: The cheap 1.6 brake upgrade is to simply buy a pair of 1.8 discs, carriers and pads, even though the more expensive Sport calipers/discs or even the Wilwood calipers are available. So it is the same for suspension as I see it. Yes, Meisters get recommended a lot - I have a set myself. But if I was honest, for fast road use, I could've quite as easily gone for mk2 shock/spring and been perfectly happy with that. I would presume that many people modify with the intention of modifying further and so they buy the best they can. I still hold the opinion that if anything gets replaced then it gets replaced with 'something better' and yet I still don't know why I do when OEM replacement would probably do the job...
|
|
|
Post by wannabe on Jul 26, 2016 17:19:58 GMT
I still hold the opinion that if anything gets replaced then it gets replaced with 'something better' and yet I still don't know why I do when OEM replacement would probably do the job... Because marketing conditions us to think that moooaaarrr is betterer! lol After all, Mazda spending millions of yen on developing the MX5 were bound to have got it wrong when compared to some bloke working something up in a garage in Sunderland or wherever lol (Not to say that time and technology and the application of knowledge hasn't developed better products than OEM kit, but you get my point )
|
|
|
Post by Horney on Jul 26, 2016 17:39:58 GMT
A good example is bushes, the OEM ones are the best for handling. SuperPro and other poly ones are just overkill. Drive a car on fresh OEM bushes with your preferred level of damping and spring rate and you'll realise that poly bushes are a massive waste of money.
|
|
|
Post by ghostrider on Jul 26, 2016 17:55:35 GMT
I do remember (albeit on the OC forum) that a member who was formerly a motoring journalist for many years, returned his 80+ thousand mile mx5 to entirely standard OEM suspension. New bushes, new springs, new shocks, standard wheels and I remember how impressed he was with the package as a whole. Visually, renovating rather than modifying, outwardly may not appear to be the most exciting of changes but it is quite possible that Mazda knew a thing or two...
|
|
|
Post by wannabe on Jul 26, 2016 20:10:07 GMT
I do remember (albeit on the OC forum) that a member who was formerly a motoring journalist for many years, returned his 80+ thousand mile mx5 to entirely standard OEM suspension. New bushes, new springs, new shocks, standard wheels and I remember how impressed he was with the package as a whole. Visually, renovating rather than modifying, outwardly may not appear to be the most exciting of changes but it is quite possible that Mazda knew a thing or two... Is this the chap? John Simister? www.mx5nutz.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=257593#entry3049449(Few posts under that one as well.)
|
|
|
Post by myothercarsa2cv on Jul 26, 2016 21:16:33 GMT
I'm a big fan of standard bushes. I'm also a big fan of BC coilovers. Together they are perfect for me. I never understood the craze behind big wheels and low profile tyres, everything's just more comfortable and predictable (and lighter) with smaller wheels. There are limitations in terms of tyre choice though, of course... I've never done anything that hasn't been done before I don't think on any of my cars. But I do do a lot of research on what I should do. Generally my focus is on cost effectiveness I like tinkering. As long as I'm having fun, or helping others, I'm happy.
|
|
|
Post by Rickster on Jul 26, 2016 22:25:15 GMT
I agree with all the posts here, it is very easy to get drawn into the world of "you must have this and that, don't buy used or cheap" - why not if it works I came from the Focus ST world where you can pour thousands into unnecessary modifying. I have the mk2 suspension with one coil off, it's excellent especially as my set cost £100! I also have cheap polybushes - no problem at all as long as they are fitted correctly. I would sooner fit OEM bushes than these v expensive poly version that are recommended on Nutz etc! My only indulgence has been the ME221 and that was because I like plugging in the laptop and fiddling about! I have a setup that I can quickly unplug and go back to standard, and while the difference is noticeable, without FI, I think the upgraded ECU is probably unnecessary. I will try all sorts of things if I like the idea of it but in the end I don't waste money - I did that on my ST!!
|
|
|
Post by bombercounty5 on Jul 27, 2016 9:23:19 GMT
I'll stick my more than pointless 2pence in It also depends on what you want to use the car for and how hard you push the car, are you a steady eddy or like to think you turn into Ari vatanen when a good set of backroads unwinds infront of you (I know I like to think i'm the latter ) For me, the Mx5/eunos is one of the best cars that I have ever bought, also one of the cheapest.# I won't bore you with the countless cars i've had but hey, i've had Dc2's/S2k and can honestly say my £660 Mx5 is up there punching well above it's weight with both of those cars... the suspension set up I put on my teg cost over double what my whole mx5 did. I consider myself to be a pretty keen, balanced, competent driver not scared of that loud pedal when it comes to some back road blasting, Would I spend that much on shocks again for a road/track car? Not a chance. Ok, I only have Minimal track experience, but surely bounding down some undulating knackered old Lincolnshire B roads is more of a test for good suspension than a silky smooth track? (i'm already going off on a tangent here I know, but hey, if you're bored carry on reading!) And i'd like to meet another person around here who has spent more time on the twisties than I have. When I picked my mx5 up it had stock shocks/springs, budget tyres. It handled great considering. I replaced the setup with the OEM bilstiens/20mm eibach lowered springs, fitted a roll bar at the same time, result? Stiff as a dead badger. I can honestly say I don't think i've found one thread on mx5 nutz praising these shocks, every man and his dog seems to think them way to harsh, maybe they are just zimmer frame bound casualties. I think they're great, more than adequate for a sub grand motor. The are stiffer than stock, The damping in my opinion is spot on. I don't find the car jumping over bumps and lumps in the road, ok so you've got to hang onto the wheel a bit but they give me full confidence in the car, it's never bottomed out and It hasn't bump steered me anywhere. Maybe i'm just an animal that likes to be shook about, I like to know i'm driving hard when I do! There's a humpback bridge local to me which I regularly see airtime over and they are showing no signs off abuse! I had Tein master flex on my Teg, 32 way settings this and that, springs this and that. Hell, I aint competing in the WRC, do I really need this on my cheapo road car?! They were crashy uncomfy and i'd never buy another set again. For the 2 minutes I was on perfectly smooth asphalt they were good, but besides that, a nightmare. As for Chassis flex. I can't really feel any chassis flex in my car with the billies/Rollbar. My bushes (far as i'm aware) are stock, no under chassis bracing. Granted, I think bushes would taughten it up a bit, but I wouldn't want the chassis to be any stiffer, I don't think it would cope as a fast road car, maybe as a designated track car. It amazes me, you'll see people on forums banging on about this setup, that set up, go watch them on a track day or watch some videos on you tube and see that my mother would push a car harder, So you can't ALWAYS listen to what people have to say. Advice is good, it stops you buying utter Log Canoe, but first hand experience of driving cars with certain set ups is a much better way to help decide what you want from you're own car. Unless you have one million Ugandan dollars in your bank and can afford to test, trial and brake numerous set ups! I realise i've just rambled, lots of which probably makes no sense. But in my opinion, unless you are a big time racer or serious track junkie, you don't need to fork out big for an MX5. They are light, simple, well balanced from the factory and don't need major suspension upgrades. This is probably the only car I have had and ever will, that I have left budget tyres on until they have worn out, because only after 80/90% maximum attack have I found the front to understeer slightly, depending on road conditions. And the front tyres on my car are cheaper than lidl bargain booze. The rear may as well be welded to the road. It only has 115 lazy bhp stock, you'd do well to out drive a nearly stock mx5 chassis with nearly stock power.
|
|
|
Post by ghostrider on Jul 27, 2016 9:24:25 GMT
I do remember (albeit on the OC forum) that a member who was formerly a motoring journalist for many years, returned his 80+ thousand mile mx5 to entirely standard OEM suspension. New bushes, new springs, new shocks, standard wheels and I remember how impressed he was with the package as a whole. Visually, renovating rather than modifying, outwardly may not appear to be the most exciting of changes but it is quite possible that Mazda knew a thing or two... Is this the chap? John Simister? www.mx5nutz.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=257593#entry3049449(Few posts under that one as well.) The very same chap, yes...
|
|