|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 21, 2016 22:59:05 GMT
Plan included. Just add a reel of gaffa tape, some mercury and a physicist who can spanner...
|
|
|
|
Post by jackyboy on Nov 22, 2016 22:57:42 GMT
Thats on on watch later list for the next time i am drinking beer having a you tube session.
|
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 22, 2016 22:59:26 GMT
Winning MPG too!  |
|
|
|
Post by jackyboy on Nov 25, 2016 22:05:23 GMT
Quite enjoyed that. i dont think any one can deny it really. You should subscribe to secureteam on you tube and suspiciousobservers. Good stuff.
|
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 26, 2016 17:18:23 GMT
The trouble with youtube are all the distractions and craziness / entertainment. The above topic was an example of something which distracted me.
I tend to focus on more down to earth topics, such as the bankers using politicians as puppets for their owns ends - reading between the lines of the BS news we are served up on a daily basis. I started off researching the history of the Rothschild and Rockefeller families, then following it through... the hegelian dialectic situations which explains all the world wars being fought for hidden reasons beyond the daily news. People need to wake up before its too late.
|
|
|
|
Post by martiny on Nov 26, 2016 22:42:09 GMT
Too late for what?
<edit to add> Okay, I managed to last about 20 minutes into the video but I really can't be rear canoed to watch any more. The guy's currently telling a story about some 'friend' who went along to a public airshow and accidentally got let into an area where the military were displaying three hovering flying saucers.
Just want to pause and think about that for a moment. Someone decided that the thing to do with these alleged top secret copies of captured alien technology was to take them along to a public airshow and stick them in a hanger there to be shown off to a bunch of generals or other bigwigs. And be careful not to let any of the public into that area. But not so careful that some guy didn't get in by accident.
I does occur to me that if you intend to show off your top secret flying saucers to a bunch of senior officers, you take the generals to the secret saucers, not the other way around. You definitely do not make them a sideshow at a public event. And why did they have to know about them anyway? The thing about top secret stuff is you simply don't tell anyone who doesn't need to know.
I gather he's a professional illustrator. Does he make a good living out of selling his drawings of imaginary spacecraft to credulous UFO nuts?
|
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 27, 2016 10:41:34 GMT
I think the point is they are not UFOs as they have been identified as being man made by Lockheed, Skunkworks etc. They are merely Objects. They are just American military vehicles with their design possibly dating back to what Nikola Tesla discovered a very long time ago.
The real question is why the secrecy? If you have that technology what purpose would it serve to keep it quiet? Perhaps to keep mankind dependent upon buying oil until the day it has run out. Or potentially to enable hidden covert missions. Use your imagination.
|
|
|
|
Post by Horney on Nov 27, 2016 14:20:26 GMT
I have my eye on this thread. Play nice and no winding each other up. :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 27, 2016 15:41:18 GMT
I wont get drawn into a long discussion on this. For one thing it is not really my field.
All I'd suggest is keeping an open mind on ALL subjects, whether it is banking, wars, or anything else. The mainstream media is largely nonsense, so you cannot rely on that alone. You have to read up on subjects and try and see between the lines.
Usually the answer to most questions asked is sadly money (power).
|
|
|
|
Post by Horney on Nov 27, 2016 16:27:17 GMT
Fair enough. It's just I've seen these kinds of topics descend into argueements and name calling fairly quickly. Not something I had want to see happening on here. :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 27, 2016 20:30:17 GMT
No worries from me  I just like to promote free thinking. Each person should do their own research and come to their own personal conclusions and beliefs on everything. Not just this daft topic. Expecting easy answers spoon fed from the mass media only leads to being misled IMHO. Don't discount things before you have looked at the info. That is supposed to be the basis of science Anyone is free to come to different conclusions. |
|
|
|
Post by martiny on Nov 27, 2016 21:16:13 GMT
I have my eye on this thread. Play nice and no winding each other up. :-) No problem. My view on the secrecy thing is that some rumoured aircraft weren't talked about, or their existence denied (F-117, B-2) because they were secret, while others weren't talked about because they aren't real (captured alien technology). I got to the bit in the video where the narrator asks "what if these people are telling the truth?" . Well I don't think it's a question of them lying. I think they're variously mistaken, exaggerating or have overactive imaginations. |
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 27, 2016 21:46:52 GMT
If you read the history of Nikola Tesla, Viktor Schauberger, Thomas Townsend Brown, John Searle, Eric Laithwaite, John Hitchinson, Evgeny Podkletnov, you will find that many of these people have discovered some amazing things on the edge of mainstream science.
In addition, many other scientists have reasearched and some say discovered "free energy" systems. All of which are based on similar ideas to the above - that of resonance, electricity, magnetic fields. Most of which accidentally died shortly afterwards. Bear in mind the world energy market is worth tens of trillions per year.
All of the above shows the genius of man. Aliens not required.
|
|
|
|
Post by martiny on Nov 27, 2016 22:48:08 GMT
To be honest I've seen all kinds of quantum energy/free energy claims made about Tesla. Here's one: www.minds.com/blog/view/481177027093737472/open-source-plans-for-modern-tesla-free-energy-generator-released-to-publicIt's supposed to be a how-to for making your own free energy generator based on a Tesla patent. It seems to be pretty typical to claim Tesla's patents were bought by Big Oil to suppress them. The first problem with this is that's not how patents work. Patents are published. The patent gives you the right to sell licenses to other people to use your new ideas which you published. Buying someone's patent doesn't un-publish it and somehow make it secret, it just transfers the licensing rights to the buyer. The second problem is that the link to "view and download the plans" actually just takes you to the author's rambling, paranoid manifesto. The third problem is that if you actually read the genuine Tesla patent it's supposed to be based on, that isn't for any kind quantum energy generator, it's for a steam/compressed gas powered reciprocating AC generator whose clever trick is that it's claimed to be able to regulate its own operating frequency over a wide range of gas pressures. So while I absolutely agree with you about not rejecting stuff without considering the evidence, the evidence has a habit of making extraordinary claims evaporate. |
|
|
|
Post by V6 on Nov 28, 2016 8:35:14 GMT
If for instance you were in a banking family such as the Rothschilds or Rockefellers who own the world banks, own the federal reserve, literally print all the money, own the energy suppliers, etc, that puts you in a position of great power. If they control world wars for profit and own Washington, how much do you think it would cost to control a patent clerk? IMHO, only certain things which are not a threat will be published.
If I stumbled upon a free energy system Id immediately upload it to the Internet for free. That way I'd wake up alive in the morning.
|
|
le sigh
Jul 15, 2023 20:03:52 GMT
le sigh
Jul 15, 2023 20:03:52 GMT