|
Post by dculley on Feb 29, 2016 7:00:01 GMT
I love my little m45 with intercooler and running on e85. Just the right size for our engines, though I bet the 2 litter with a mp62 would be amazing...
|
|
|
Post by Matt Scarbro on Mar 2, 2016 14:09:17 GMT
Can we add centrifugal supercharger to the options?.. Very different delivery to typical superchargers and nicely in keeping with the 'Rev it hard to go fast' nasp experience. FWIW my vote would be turbo for road car, centricharger for track
|
|
|
Post by skuzzle on Mar 3, 2016 20:13:55 GMT
Centri chargers don't seem to have a place for me.. Very boring power delivery.. No torque.. Decent HP.. But without the proper work to get there.. Nah ya can keep that.
|
|
|
Post by Matt Scarbro on Mar 4, 2016 9:35:15 GMT
The torque delivery is very similar to nasp engines so yes boring in terms of not having the big wave of torque provided by a turbo. However that means the tyres and gearbox also don't have to deal with a big wave of torque .
I like the way nasp engines (the best ones anyway) encourage you to keep the car on the boil, and keep the revs high so for me it's a great choice for the track.
It can also stack up favourably in terms of bang for buck compared to nasp tuning, whilst retaining the same delivery.
|
|
|
Post by Horney on Mar 4, 2016 9:38:21 GMT
Probably goes well with the Vtec Yo! in yours as well.
|
|
Toby
Chats A Bit
Posts: 149
|
Post by Toby on Mar 5, 2016 8:10:52 GMT
I've had to go Turbo, I'm sure if my supercharged car had the extra 100bhp the turbo does I'd be more inclined to vote for it though :-D
|
|
|
Post by lazza on Mar 5, 2016 20:19:23 GMT
I've had to go Turbo, I'm sure if my supercharged car had the extra 100bhp the turbo does I'd be more inclined to vote for it though :-D My supercharged Mk2.5 has 100bhp more than standard
|
|
Toby
Chats A Bit
Posts: 149
|
Post by Toby on Mar 8, 2016 19:32:24 GMT
I've had to go Turbo, I'm sure if my supercharged car had the extra 100bhp the turbo does I'd be more inclined to vote for it though :-D My supercharged Mk2.5 has 100bhp more than standard Oh I meant 100bhp more than the Supercharged car
|
|
|
Post by Reechard on Mar 9, 2016 20:24:15 GMT
currently have neither but I want to turbo unicorn charge mine
|
|
|
Post by mplsblack on Apr 8, 2016 21:08:54 GMT
A turbo for my 5, a turbo for my daily drive and a turbo for the wife's car. So turbo's all round
|
|
|
Post by atlex on Apr 8, 2016 22:07:30 GMT
A turbo for my 5, a turbo for my daily drive and a turbo for the wife's car. So turbo's all round couldn't help it..
|
|
|
Post by mplsblack on Apr 9, 2016 8:11:55 GMT
Haha fair
|
|
pewe
Chats A Bit
Posts: 157
|
Post by pewe on Apr 9, 2016 9:15:58 GMT
Supercharged 1.6. Plant your foot and it's instant go. Almost the same as cracking open the throttle on a bike. Learned to live with its thirst though (22mpg no matter how its driven!) Cheers, Pewe.
|
|
|
Post by niklas on May 13, 2016 8:05:03 GMT
I'm with Scarboro on this, even though I track a turbo car.
|
|
|
Post by rhyswh on May 13, 2016 9:47:32 GMT
I always liked the idea of a supercharger with the instant power/bigger engine type idea but then I drove a turbo mx5 and I changed my mind lol
|
|