|
Post by atlex on Mar 29, 2016 14:15:12 GMT
I was thinking about what each maker's philosophy is.. and how it shows up in the cars - what are these companies producing, what are they aiming for ? it's quite interesting to think about. Found this.. for mazda.. "Gram" Strategy. www.mazdasocial.co.uk/2016/03/24/the-gram-strategy-how-saving-weight-makes-mazdas-better-to-drive/removing the things that aren't needed to be a car. Kind of the opposite of the 2000s mercedes strategy with buttons everywhere the toyota kaizen concept leads to amazing quality, but slightly dull cars (which make perfect family/practical cars, would let your loved ones drive one..) https://www.reddit.com/r/cars/comments/4ahnvc/what_car_brand_follows_the_best_philosophy_when/ I think of Honda as "Precision Perfection" - kind of between mazda (experimental) and toyota (quality) - the civic, s2000 and nsx are all amazingly balanced cars. Mitsubishi ? (all prarrie canoeboxes or prarrie canoeboxes on steroids.. feel like civil engineering projects designed by comittee who never drove the product) Nissan ? (flood the market with models, questionable long-term build quality (?), interesting monster halo cars which seem to be strategic failures) Daihatsu ? seem to have the K-car market in japan down, super-small engineering done right. Small-scale Practicality above all. Subaru ? Only seem to make one kind of car. Also a bit mitsubishi-like-committee, it seems to me ? Comments, Opinions, counter-comments, grave insults and rants all welcome.
|
|
Clem
Chats A Bit
Posts: 236
|
Post by Clem on Mar 29, 2016 16:32:00 GMT
Lotus Car Strategy - Simplify and add lightness which theyre pretty good at. Keeps the cars well focussed and puts the Mazda gram strategy to shame ... Lotus Business Strategy - Always remain 1 month from bankruptcy. Also something theyre good at
|
|
|
Post by ghostrider on Mar 29, 2016 20:16:37 GMT
My favourite Lotus story was that; during their financial crisis, Colin Chapman had to sell the company jet to pay workers wages.
The Jet was leased! That is some creative thinking, right there. It bought him a couple of months to turn the situation around...
|
|
|
Post by ghostrider on Mar 29, 2016 20:28:47 GMT
As for car-making ethos then I'd find it difficult to fault TVR from an enthusiast point of view, if not any financial one. Light weight, rear driven with engines at the front. Hugely powerful with outlandish design quirks. Who cared if it never worked - look at the thing. Personally I could forgive any car a lot that looked as good, sounded as good or went that fast. Not a great business plan, granted, but I appreciated it all the same. Wilkinson never lost that 'bitsa' mentality that he grew up with. His cars were full of other cars. Sometimes it's just fun picking out the bits you recognise. I met Trevor Wilkinson once at the Earls Court Motorfair. He was showing off the Speed 12 but had plans of doing another shell entirely in carbon and with 600bhp. I told him, tongue in cheek, that I always thought his TVR's needed less weight and more power. He just laughed and shrugged at me and said 'it's what I do'.
Flawed but wonderful too...
|
|